I think we must love to read about dystopian futures
because they allow us to imagine the unimaginable and shiver in the dark while
feeling grateful that things aren’t quite that bad. The thing I dislike most about
dystopian literature is this way that our horrible future is so engrossing, we
forget to ask how we ended up there. Cristin Terrell's All
Our Yesterdays takes that dare and explores the possibility of using the
past to change the future.
I’ll be honest, when I picked up All Our Yesterdays,
I was bracing for yet another Hunger
Games dystopia. Instead, I got a compelling read that examines the
thinking and behaviors that can contribute to the creation of dystopian
societies, and a thoughtful discussion of how we can and cannot control the
trajectories of our lives.
It was, in my humble opinion, a
roller-coaster worth buckling up for. I started the book on Super Bowl Sunday.
And finished it on Super Bowl Sunday because I couldn’t seem to put it down for
longer than it took to make snacks and occasionally glance up at the game (remember
that game? The book was infinitely more engrossing).
The premise of Yesterdays is that Em, who has been imprisoned in a secret military
base that houses a time machine, is the only person who can prevent the
probable future. She is the only one who saw the beginning of the cultural
shift that led to the totalitarian society she now loves in. If she can get to
the time machine, she might be able to return to those moments when the shift
was nascent, and correct the thing that tipped her society into this military
state. Unfortunately, as we learn, this
is a correction she’s attempted to make many times.
There are corollaries to our evolving
society (think NSA), and enough twists and unexpected turns to keep readers
guessing throughout. There are also enough surprises, red herrings, and dead ends to make it difficult to
summarize the book without giving much of it away. What I can say is this: read
it!
Have I mentioned how much I liked this
book?
What worked:
The narrative voice: Terrill writes with a great assurance
and energy; the POV moves between Em and Marina who are very strong female
leads, each of whom brings a different voice to the work.
The plot: The tension was nail-biting in many places, the
story itself was engrossing and well-paced. There were enough twists and turns
to keep me guessing throughout the novel.
The characters: James and Finn, as secondary leads are
anything but secondary. Like Em, they’re both richly written, complicated and
compelling characters. Em might be the protagonist, but it is largely James and
Finn’s story.
What didn’t work quite as well:
The “twist” was transparent earlier, I think, than the
author wanted. While it didn’t ruin the novel for me, I wished I hadn’t figured
it out quite as quickly as I did because it watered down the suspense just a
bit. Note, however, that it didn’t
keep me from racing through the book.
The resolution was a little vague. One of the challenges of
writing about time travel and time paradoxes is making the chaos accessible and
very, very clear to the reader. While
most of the book had the necessary
pieces, the end wrap-up missed a couple of the threads.
Compulsive readability scale: a solid 9. In order to be a 10, it would have to keep me
up half the night or at least away from the Super Bowl snacks.
No comments :
Post a Comment